Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Guys and Dolls

Color is key in marketing children’s toys, before young boys and girls can talk or read they are keenly aware and consistently bombarded with visual advertising. While stores are becoming more sensitive to the gendered nature of the toys they sell, the clear divide between pink and blue centric isles is astonishing. Specifically, Target seemed to more heavily rely on the use of these binary colors (pink and blue)  in toys targeted to younger children. Visual persuasion and gendered color assignment seem to occur in toys marketed to children who cannot yet read, and as they grow, toys more subtly hint at a gendered audience through shapes, print/ descriptions, and touches of pink or blue mixed with other colors. Toys geared toward boys tended to have more sharp edges and descriptions which include the words ‘super’, ‘action’, or ‘hero’; toys geared toward girls tended to have round edges, in both the toy’s makeup and the lettering of its description, and often include the words ‘baby’, ‘love’, or ‘doll’.  

The most unrest I felt when looking at these segregated toy groupings occurred after I saw a pink Melissa & Doug Feeding set—including bottles and a bib—decorated with butterflies, hearts, and a curly script across the bottom which read “Mine to Love”. Targeting this doll feeding set to young girls is potentially problematic because it implies the responsibility of caring for and being affectionate toward a child is decidedly individual and female, “Mine to Love” well, “Her’s to Love”. This example not only plants a marketed pressure for increased responsibility and affection on girls at an early age, but also seems to wrongly imply that the boundary of loving, sensitive, nurturing behavior is one not to be crossed by boys. While this may seem like a harmless way to sell doll accessories, it is only one poor example in a sea of questionable marketing choices. Toys are stepping stones through which children imagine and discover their society, it seems we are limiting young boys and girls with the very artifacts that could and should be used as incredibly influential teaching tools.

4 comments:

  1. I completely agree with you here, the children are being limited in their options without even realizing it! horrible honestly

    ReplyDelete
  2. Color is key! You can look down isles and see the color differences. In a girls isle you hardly see any color that is not pink. In guys isles one can see that they are mainly "masculine" colors. I also like your view that toys are "stepping stones." That is an excellent way to put it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with when you said that children are basically being confined in a box of how they should act and the role they are assigned in society. There's so many limitations. Nice job!

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is very intriguing that you decided to tackle the issue of gender normative color schemes. As a society, we perpetuate this ideology with gender reveal parties where the two colors are embraced as the color schemes of the favors. Growing up, I was always judged for wearing pink colored shirts. I LOOKED GREAT IN PINK. I wasn't going to not wear that color! :p

    ReplyDelete