Color
is key in marketing children’s toys, before young boys and girls can talk or
read they are keenly aware and consistently bombarded with visual advertising. While
stores are becoming more sensitive to the gendered nature of the toys they
sell, the clear divide between pink and blue centric isles is astonishing. Specifically,
Target seemed to more heavily rely on the use of these binary colors (pink and
blue) in toys targeted to younger children.
Visual persuasion and gendered color assignment seem to occur in toys marketed
to children who cannot yet read, and as they grow, toys more subtly hint at a gendered
audience through shapes, print/ descriptions, and touches of pink or blue mixed
with other colors. Toys geared toward boys tended to have more sharp edges and
descriptions which include the words ‘super’, ‘action’, or ‘hero’; toys geared
toward girls tended to have round edges, in both the toy’s makeup and the
lettering of its description, and often include the words ‘baby’, ‘love’, or ‘doll’.
The
most unrest I felt when looking at these segregated toy groupings occurred
after I saw a pink Melissa & Doug Feeding set—including bottles and a bib—decorated
with butterflies, hearts, and a curly script across the bottom which read “Mine
to Love”. Targeting this doll feeding set to young girls is potentially
problematic because it implies the responsibility of caring for and being
affectionate toward a child is decidedly individual and female, “Mine to Love” well, “Her’s to Love”. This example not only plants a marketed pressure for increased
responsibility and affection on girls at an early age, but also seems to
wrongly imply that the boundary of loving, sensitive, nurturing behavior is one
not to be crossed by boys. While this may seem like a harmless way to sell doll
accessories, it is only one poor example in a sea of questionable marketing
choices. Toys are stepping stones through which children imagine and discover
their society, it seems we are limiting young boys and girls with the very
artifacts that could and should be used as incredibly influential teaching tools.
I completely agree with you here, the children are being limited in their options without even realizing it! horrible honestly
ReplyDeleteColor is key! You can look down isles and see the color differences. In a girls isle you hardly see any color that is not pink. In guys isles one can see that they are mainly "masculine" colors. I also like your view that toys are "stepping stones." That is an excellent way to put it.
ReplyDeleteI agree with when you said that children are basically being confined in a box of how they should act and the role they are assigned in society. There's so many limitations. Nice job!
ReplyDeleteIt is very intriguing that you decided to tackle the issue of gender normative color schemes. As a society, we perpetuate this ideology with gender reveal parties where the two colors are embraced as the color schemes of the favors. Growing up, I was always judged for wearing pink colored shirts. I LOOKED GREAT IN PINK. I wasn't going to not wear that color! :p
ReplyDelete